logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.06.11 2018노4113
사기등
Text

The parts concerning Defendant A, C, D, and B of the first and second original judgments shall be reversed, respectively.

Defendant

A. Imprisonment.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendants A did not play the role of managing subordinate staff at the scam organization of this case. 2) Defendants A did not play the role of managing each of the Defendants’ respective sentences [Defendant A: 4 years of imprisonment (the first judgment), 1 year and 6 months of imprisonment (the second judgment), 2 years and 6 months of imprisonment (the first judgment), 1 year and 6 months of imprisonment (the second judgment), 1 year and 9 months of imprisonment (the second judgment), 8 months of imprisonment (the second judgment), 2 years of imprisonment (the second judgment), 1 year and 6 months of imprisonment (the second judgment), 1 year and 6 months of imprisonment (the second judgment) and 2 years of imprisonment, 1 year and 1 year and 6 years of imprisonment (the second judgment), 2018 high judgment (the second judgment), 2018 high judgment (the second judgment) and 2 years of imprisonment with prison labor (the second judgment) and 2 years of imprisonment with prison labor) and 35 days of imprisonment, 30 days of imprisonment with prison labor and 15 days of attached Table 2(the second (the second judgment) to 5 days).

B. The above sentence sentenced by the court below against Defendant A, C, and D is too unffortable and unfair.

2. Determination

A. Prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal by the Defendants ex officio, the first and second judgments were rendered on the Defendants, Defendant A, C, and D, and the Prosecutor filed an appeal against the first and second judgments on the judgment of the court of first instance. The above Defendants filed an appeal against the first and second judgments on the said Defendants, and this court rendered a decision to jointly deliberate on each of the above appeals cases. The first and second judgments on the above Defendants are concurrent offenses under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and one sentence is to be rendered pursuant to Article 38(1) of the Criminal Act. As such, among the first and second judgments on the first and second judgments, the parts on Defendants A, C, and D cannot be maintained as they are.

(b).

arrow