1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The court's explanation of the instant case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except where the court makes a dismissal or addition of the judgment as follows. Thus, this shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The third-party 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows. "At the graduate school," the third-party 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance, 8 and 9 were submitted.

The result of the L team leader receiving unfair instructions from the L team leader, and the application for leave of absence was made to enter a graduate school, but the non-approval was made without reasonable grounds. It was inevitable to think that the plaintiff was in accordance with the defendant's intent to exclude the plaintiff from the organization, and since the defendant's unilateral measures are no longer likely to be selected, the plaintiff submitted a resignation without any choice, the plaintiff submitted a resignation from the 6th to 7th of the 1st of the judgment of the first instance court "from the 6th of the 21st to the 7th of the 1st of the 1st judgment."

The following is added to the evidence submitted by the plaintiff, including the evidence submitted by the court of first instance, that is insufficient to recognize that the defendant strongly demanded the plaintiff to submit a private employee, or that the plaintiff deceivings the plaintiff. There is no other evidence to acknowledge this. Even according to the plaintiff's assertion, the moving of the department to the plaintiff is not only daily before about six months from the time of the submission of resignation, but also there is no particular dispute concerning the moving of the department between the plaintiff and the defendant after the moving of the department.

The Plaintiff’s sending time of the above e-mail, seeing the Defendant’s representative director, is 18:24:59, and the Plaintiff has delayed more than 18:21 minutes of the Plaintiff’s receipt of the above e-mail, and ought to seal it to the account that sent the e-mail to see the hidden see, and the witness D of the first instance court, the e-mail sender, refers to the e-mail.