Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 8.2 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 7, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 07:40, the Defendant: (b) expressed that the Defendant used by the Defendant in the interesting prison located in 2667, the Defendant did not set the living room in several times at the demand of the school of the head interesting prison; (c) that the said D opened the living room and does not want to capture and brue the waste; (d) expressed that the said D would want to read “the hum humb. h. h. h. n. h. h. h. n. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. n. h. h. h. n. h. h. n. h. n. h. h. n. h. n. h. n. h. n.h. n. h. h. n.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate performance of duties concerning the custody and safe guard of correctional public officials.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods on August 11, 2017, on the ground that at around 16:00 on August 11, 2017, the Defendant: “Chewingly Chewing, dead fluored shacked shacked c windows used by another prisoner, from the fluoral fluor of the instant entertainment prison women’s playgrounds.”

“In large interest,” and around KRW 100,000,000 of the city’s price was damaged by putting a changeed glass to strengthen the windows of toilets.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to E, F, and D;

1. A written estimate, etc. for an investigation report;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the flag photographs, CCTV-flag photographs, flag rash photographs, and toilet flag photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act (a) of the Criminal Act (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties) concerning criminal facts; the choice of each fine for a crime;

1. The sentencing factors under Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, as well as other factors of sentencing, including Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, and all the conditions of sentencing as indicated in the arguments, shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the following factors:

The factors of sentencing in favor of the defendant are the confession of the defendant, and the defendant suffers from decentralization.