1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation as to this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the following addition to the text of the judgment of the first instance. Thus, it shall be cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

According to the first instance judgment No. 4, 8 of the first instance judgment, the following contents are added, 4. However, this is due to the fact that E and F have been reversed or written, despite the lapse of time and memory in order to be dilution or to escape from the situation, and that E’s false statement as her parent’s origin is ambiguous. It is also true that E and F have no evidence to verify identity card on the day of the instant case. Under the consistently stated that E and F have no evidence to prove identity card, it cannot be rejected on the sole basis of the fact that E and F have reversed or written some false statements, which infringe on the basic credibility of their statements concerning the main contents of the instant case, 5.0 billion won, 100 won, 100 won, 200 won, 200 won, 400 won, 200 won, 100 won, 200 won, 400 won, 200 won, 200 won, 200 won, 400 won, etc.