logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.01.13 2016고합241
직권남용권리행사방해등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and fines of 15,000,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of two years.

Defendant

A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants’ status was appointed as FF 9 level around February 17, 1992, and Defendant A performed the duties of construction and sewage management of the former Construction City Bureau from January 29, 2009 to January 12, 2012, G construction and sewage management; the former Construction City Green Areas from January 13, 2012 to July 9, 2012; the former Construction City Bureau Green Areas from July 10, 2012 to August 21, 2014; and the former Construction Headquarters Facilities Section 2 Team of H Construction Headquarters Facilities from July 10, 201 to August 21, 2014, while serving at the 2 team of the above H Construction Headquarters Facilities at H, performing the duties of connecting construction works and construction works to K.

Defendant

B is a representative of "M", which is an individual entrepreneur for L's business of manufacturing signboards and advertisements, etc., and the defendant A is a friendly relationship with the defendant.

2. Defendant A

A. Around 2006, “J Road Expansion Works” outlined the “J Road Expansion Work” did not begin with respect to “J Road Expansion Works” that was ordered by H Si (General Construction Headquarters) due to the National Treasury subsidies, etc. On May 15, 2012, H (General Construction Headquarters) rendered a decision to modify the public law regarding I, among them, on May 15, 2012, entered into a supplementary design service agreement with N (Representative; hereinafter “N”) on May 24, 2012 and “N’s implementation of the J Road Expansion Construction Work’s Supplementary Design Service (Supplementary Work). From June 2012, 2012:

7. The public officials in charge of the I Construction Headquarters’s I Construction Headquarters, including Haman P, set the RPS construction method that Q used to adopt as a method related to the I’s production, and notified it to N in the design service private person, so that Q would adopt it.

The above Q established (State Q; hereinafter “R”) R on October 2012, and registered the RPS exclusive license on November 9, 2012. The Defendant belonged to the Defendant.

H On November 5, 2012, the public officials in charge of the Si General Construction Headquarters dealt with the I-related design modification service as if the design modification service was completed, although the N did not complete the I-related design modification service reflecting the above RPS construction method, and R entered into an agreement on January 15, 2013 with H on the use of the patent construction method with H (General Construction Headquarters) and on January 15, 2013, and on January 2013.

arrow