1. The Defendants shall be jointly and severally liable:

A. As to KRW 12,294,550 among Plaintiff A and KRW 7,00,000 among them, from December 18, 2015.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On March 2015, Plaintiff A entered the F High School operated by Defendant School Foundation D (hereinafter “Defendant School Foundation”) (hereinafter “Defendant School”).

Plaintiff

A was subject to the three-day disciplinary action on June 2015 on the ground that he/she was absent from school without permission and smoke from school without permission during his/her school, and later he/she was unable to participate in the above school services without permission and was subject to the five-day disciplinary action on July 2015 on the ground that he/she failed to comply with instructions.

Plaintiff

B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A.

B. At around 16:40 on October 20, 2015, Plaintiff A used assaulting Defendant E, a student leading teacher, in front of and in the curriculum of the first-class G class class in the second-class class in the Defendant School, the second-class class in the Defendant School. The Defendant School prepared a “student’s report” based on Defendant E’s teacher’s opinion and submitted it to the Guidance Committee, and the said report (hereinafter “instant report”).

The summary of the instant case is as follows: (a) the Plaintiff’s assault against Defendant E, which caused the expulsion from school, is “instant dispute”

(1) On October 20, 2015, the summary of the instant case: (a) On October 20, 2015, a teacher E (the Defendant) was in the process of autonomous learning supervision; (b) on the second floor, the second floor and the second floor and the second floor of the instant case pointed out the defect of uniforms A (the Plaintiff in the instant case) from the second floor and the second grade and the first grade and the second grade and the second grade and the first grade and the second grade and the first grade and the second grade and the second grade of the instant case were pointed out; (c) neglected to demand correction on several occasions; (d) on the other hand, the relevant student’s body was dissatisfed by the following, and the student’s body was pushed back, and then the student’s body was tight and lower, and the student’s body was dissatisfyed in the curriculum (in the after part of the instant case, the student’s entrance in the process of confirming his identity, and the student’s order was obstructed and destroyed the floor.