The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant recognized the Defendant’s mistake; (b) the degree of injury to the victims and agreed with the victims; (c) while there are many criminal convictions in the same kind of driving under influence of alcohol and driving without license; (d) the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of suspension of the execution of the imprisonment for eight months on June 4, 2013; and (e) the blood alcohol content is 0.192% higher; and (e) the six months of imprisonment imposed by the lower court was the lower limit of the statutory penalty that has been mitigated; and (e) other factors of sentencing specified in the instant argument, such as the background of the instant crime, the circumstances after the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, the Defendant’s assertion is not deemed unreasonable because the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.