A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 15, 2015, the Defendant against the victim C may charge the victim interest at a 507 heading room located in Gangwon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gangwon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Eel”) for KRW 500,000 per month for the investment of KRW 10,000 per month in a large exhibition.

If the payment is made, 50,000 won will be paid per month if it is invested in 10,000 won per old account.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, at the time of fact, the Defendant did not engage in the above lease business and intended to use the investment money received from the injured party for personal purposes. Accordingly, even if the above money was received from the injured party, there was no intention or ability to deliver the money promised to the injured party.

On June 30, 2015, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; and (b) received delivery of KRW 8 million to the national bank account in the name of the Defendant on June 30, 2015 from the victim; and (c) in the same manner, issued a total of KRW 64 million over six times, such as the statement in the list of crimes 1.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, received property from the injured party.

2. On September 15, 2015, the Defendant against the victim F made a false statement to the victim F through the said C with the same purport as Paragraph 1, and received delivery of KRW 4.4 million from the victim on September 15, 2015 as the above account.

After that, on January 25, 2016, the Defendant called the victim at a closed place and called the victim on January 25, 2016, “If the sum of the money that the Defendant has invested in the previous payment for the entertainment business establishment and the studio rental business, 70,000 won per month will be added to the investment of KRW 10,000.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not perform the above projects and intended to use the investment money received from the victimized person for an individual purpose. Accordingly, even if the said money was received from the injured person, there was no intention or ability to deliver the money promised to the injured person.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to it.