logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.04.17 2013가단5048152
건물명도
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A’s building listed in the separate sheet No. 1;

B. Defendant B shall set forth in [Attachment List] Section 2.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the claim against the defendant A, B, and E

A. (1) On June 17, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Defendant E to set the instant building as KRW 8,546,00, and KRW 99,210 for the rent of the instant building as KRW 5,00 with respect to the building indicated in the attached list (hereinafter “instant building 5”) between Defendant E and Defendant E, and issued the instant building 5 to the said Defendant.

(2) On July 10, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Defendant A to lease the instant building as KRW 7,232,00, and KRW 83,930, with respect to the instant building as indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant building”) with Defendant A (hereinafter “instant building”). On July 10, 2012, the Plaintiff transferred the instant building to the said Defendant.

(3) On October 16, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Defendant B on the condition that the said Defendant rent the instant building as KRW 8,546,00, and KRW 99,210,00 from the Plaintiff as to the instant building as indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant building 2”). On October 16, 2012, the Plaintiff handed over the instant building to the said Defendant.

(4) After that, the above Defendants did not pay the difference under each of the above lease agreements more than three times a month. Accordingly, the Plaintiff terminated each of the above lease agreements against the Defendants as a delivery of a duplicate of the complaint of this case.

[Reasons for Recognition] Defendant A: The descriptions of the evidence Nos. 2 and 3 of the Civil Procedure Act, the purport of the whole pleadings, and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the facts of the above recognition, each of the above lease agreements between the plaintiff and the above defendants was lawfully terminated due to the nonperformance of the above defendants' obligation to pay rent. Thus, the defendant A, the lessor, the defendant B, the defendant B, and the defendant E are obligated to deliver the building of this case to the plaintiff of this case, and the building of this case to the plaintiff of this case.

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant C and D

arrow