beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) 4,504,450 won to Plaintiff A and 5% per annum from August 28, 2015 to November 29, 2017; and (b).
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The parties’ opening 1) Plaintiff A (F) is the husband of Plaintiff B, and Plaintiff C and D are children. The Plaintiff’s opening is a “matez” type, which is smaller than 3 km in weight (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s opening”).
2) The Defendant’s opening is a type of “Alleytber” with a large weight of 27 km and 51 cm (hereinafter “Defendant’s opening”). Alleytber generally complies with people without any boundary and is used as a guide dog, etc.
In May 201, the defendant's opening was a basic training at the pet training school, and was awarded a prize in September 23, 2012.
(See the plaintiff and the plaintiff's opening, the defendant and the defendant's opening. (B)
The Plaintiff A, on August 28, 2015, led the Plaintiff’s dog to the H Park located in G G in the G Park in Suwon-gu, G around 17:00.
Plaintiff
A and the plaintiff's opening met with the defendant and the defendant's opening, who had a distance of about 10 meters from the h park, outside the He Park.
The plaintiff's dog fights with the plaintiff's dog towards the defendant's dog and the plaintiff's dog fights were fighting, and the plaintiff A exceeded the plaintiff's first week during the process, and the plaintiff's dog fights were cut off.
(hereinafter “instant accident”. The Plaintiff asserts that the date of the instant accident was August 28, 2015, and the Defendant asserted that the date of the instant accident was August 27, 2015, and that the date of August 27, 2015. The Plaintiff appears to have received medical treatment in the A-U.S. emergency department on August 28, 2015, and that the date of the accident was a gold day on August 28, 2015) / [based on recognition] evidence 2, evidence 3, evidence 1, 6, 20, 24, evidence 3, evidence 3, witness I, witness I’s testimony, and the purport of the entire pleadings.
2. The parties' assertion
A. The plaintiffs A suffered injuries while the defendant's dog exceeded dump plants.
① The Defendant violated the duty to safely manage and supervise large dogs and ② neglected identification and relief measures immediately after the accident.
Plaintiff
A shall compensate the Defendant for damages arising from the tort.