(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.12.09 2016고단2443

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.12.09 2016고단2443

강제추행

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 27, 2016, at around 20:00 - 22:00, the Defendant used the Defendant’s hand on the left side of the Victim F (one-year-old) in the E-cafeteria located in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Gyeonggi-do, for two to three times, the Defendant used the Defendant’s hand on the victim’s knebbbbbbs from the Plaintiff’s Heebbs to kne, and added the next kne to several times.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Results of reproducing CCTV images CDs (No. 16 No. 16) and viewing;

1. A protocol of examination of part of the defendant by prosecution;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. F’s written statement and defense counsel asserted to the effect that the Defendant’s act was committed by committing an indecent act, such as checking the victim F’s left bucks by hand only once and using a fishing vessel, and using the victim’s bucks and rhumbbucks.

However, the victim F has consistently and specifically stated the Defendant’s act from the investigative agency to this court, the content of damage, the victim’s perception and response, and the situation before and after the commission of the crime. There is no inconsistency with witness G’s statement and the results of the CCTV CD reproduction viewing, as well as the result of the Defendant’s operation, and there is no reason to make the victim, who was the KIKO Pafafafafafafabbabbba in charge of the charge of the charge of perjury, and thus, there is no reason to regard the Defendant’s falsity in the statement as false, unlike this, in light of this court’s attitude to make the statement.

Witnesses also make consistent and concrete statements from investigative agencies to this court, and the victim's statements are not contradictoryly contradictory to each other, and as in the case of the victim, G, who was a part-time student of the defendant's operation, particularly took charge of the punishment of the perjury, makes a false statement detrimental to the defendant.

유사 판례

-서울남부지방법원 2016.11.11 2016고단2898

-서울남부지방법원 2016.10.14 2016고단510

-서울남부지방법원 2016.11.18 2016고단3328

-서울남부지방법원 2016.09.09 2016고단1519

-서울남부지방법원 2016.11.18 2016고단2361