[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

At around 03:50 on August 7, 2016, the Defendants were asked about the reported matters from H and assistant I belonging to the Daegu Suwon Police Station G District, which was called upon 112 reports, and Defendant A was off from the body of the Defendants, and Defendant B was tightly faced with I’s right blue blue by pushing I on his own body, and Defendant B faced with I’s right blue at one time. I’s am blue with his blue.

Defendant B, who continued to be frightened by drinking women, was frightened from H, and the face of H was frighted once a drinking, and Defendant A’s body was frightened to commit the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties by taking the frighten and taking a bath to the police officer, etc., and assaulted H and I fright to be arrested as a flagrant offender in the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties.

As a result, the Defendants jointly interfered with the handling of the 112 Report Cases and the lawful execution of duties by police officers on the arrest of flagrant offenders, and at the same time, the Defendants inflicted injury on the victim H (ma, 54 years old) about two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of each police protocol to H and I;

1. Articles 257(1), 136(1), and 30 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrences of crimes;

1. Selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Selection of a fine (see, e.g., that it is an initial offender, reflects the fact that it is, and that it deposited KRW 2 million for the victim together with Defendant B);

B. Defendant B: Selection of imprisonment

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse (Defendant A);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant B) of the suspended execution;

1. Probation and community service order (defendant B) The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act (defendant B) is that the Defendant was punished by a fine in 2013 as a crime of violating the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) and even on August 8, 2015.