logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2020.04.21 2019가단16939
정비료 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff asserted that construction machinery of this case owned by the defendant (hereinafter "construction machinery of this case") has been repaired and maintained at the request of the defendant, and the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff the cost of repair and maintenance of the construction machinery of this case.

2. According to Gap evidence No. 2 (construction machine registration certificate), although the construction machine in this case is registered as owned by the defendant, the person who requested the plaintiff to repair and repair the construction machine in this case as stated at the first date of pleading is not the defendant but F, and the plaintiff was not aware of the defendant at all, it is insufficient to recognize that the above facts of recognition and the evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone requested the plaintiff to repair and repair the construction machine in this case, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit without further review.

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is dismissed as there is no reasonable ground.

arrow