Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 26, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 21:30 on 26, 2014, around the “Eski” in the operation of the victim D (the age of 65) located in Gyeyang-gu, Seoyang-gu; (b) the victim, who was coming to the ebbbbbbb in the ebbbbbane, was the victim’s son by the marier’s eb

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

2. At the above time and place of the obstruction of the performance of official duties, the Defendant: (a) took an inquiry about the instant assault case by the Goyang Police Station F District G affiliated with the Goyang Police Station F District G, and the police officer affiliated with the said police officer, who was asked by H about the said assault case, and (b) took an inquiry about the said G and H by “I am flusium, flusium, flusium, flusium, flusium, flusium, flusium, flusium, flusium, flusium, flusium, flusium, and flusium.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch of police officers to the field.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each statute on the statement of D, G and H;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the provisional payment order takes into account the characteristics of the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties in this case, and at the same time, there is no criminal records after the defendant was punished for violent crimes in 1996 and 199, and other punishment like the order shall be determined in consideration of the defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relation, criminal records