The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged stated that, on April 14, 2008, the Defendant stated that, within the vehicle parked on a road that is parked in the Gunju-dong of Pakistan, the Defendant: (a) the Defendant started operating on the water surface of the Cheongju-si and did not know well the work of the water system; (b) “Is to remove and remove the Cheongju-si construction site at the site of the Cheongju-si construction site; and (c) 20 million won may enter into a Cheongju-si contract.”

However, the fact was that the Corporation was not in progress at the time, and even D's representative E, who entered into a contract for removal and removal of scrap metal prior to the complainant, was also involved in the failure to recover funds as a result of delay in the implementation of the above contract, and even if the defendant receives money from the complainant as the down payment for the above construction site removal and removal of scrap metal, he did not have any intention or ability to allow the complainant to perform the removal and removal of scrap metal even if he did not receive money from the complainant as the down payment for the above construction site removal and removal contract.

The Defendant, by deceiving the complainant as such, received KRW 20 million from the complainant to the Agricultural Cooperatives Deposit Account in the name of F in the name of F in the name of the down payment.

2. In light of the respective legal statements of the Health Team, a witness G, E, and H with respect to whether the Defendant, at the time when the complainant was transferred from the complainant, had no intention or ability to remove the site of the Cheongju Construction and remove the scrap metal, deceiving the complainant, there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge it only by the statement at C’s investigative agency and court, and there is no other evidence to prove it otherwise.

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, a judgment of innocence is rendered pursuant to the latter part of Article 325