The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (eight million won in penalty) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination: (a) the Defendant committed the instant crime during the suspension period of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor due to the instant crime; (b) the Defendant did not agree with the victim I who is the passenger of the victimized Vehicle; or (c) the Defendant committed a crime against the Defendant; (b) the Defendant did not have any particular criminal history other than the above imprisonment; (c) the victim J and K agreed with the victim J, who is the passenger of the victimized Vehicle; (d) the victim F, who was the driver of the victimized Vehicle, did not want the Defendant’s punishment; (e) the victims did not want each injury; (e) the victims did not have any significant degree of injury; (e) the vehicle driver was covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance; (e) the circumstances favorable to the Defendant; and (e) other factors favorable to the Defendant, such as the Defendant’s age, occupation, sex, environment, etc., and the sentencing conditions indicated in the record, are deemed unfair because the sentence of the lower court is too un

Therefore, the prosecutor's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.