logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원(전주) 2015.04.13 2014누958
장해등급결정처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 1, 2008, the Plaintiff, as an employee of the Postal Construction Co., Ltd., suffered occupational accidents after falling at 7 meters high from the construction site of the New Mine Association and falling at 7 meters high.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). B.

The Plaintiff, due to the instant accident, was diagnosed as the name of the sick and wounded on the part of the Defendant, “Inscarcity No. 2 and 3 inscarcitys, scarcitys, scarcitys, scarcitys, and pulmonary damage, damage to the brutal astronomical chrons, neutical malutical booms, and brutal brus,” and was receiving medical treatment on Nov. 25,

C. On December 24, 2009, the Defendant determined the Plaintiff’s disability grade as class 17, which corresponds to “persons with the function disorder of the middle class Do and with the remaining disability of the middle class 17,” the Plaintiff’s disability grade.

The plaintiff appealed against this and filed a request for examination with the defendant, stating that "the functional disorder caused by 2 minutes 2, 3, and 4 between each other, and caused by neutronological harm to the right side due to neutronological damage, and the neutronical disorder falls under class 2, class 8, subparagraph 5, and subparagraph 5 of class 5, and the neutronic disorder caused by neutronic neutronical neutronological neutism falls under class 15 of class 12, and the neutronic neutrons caused by neutronic neutronical neutronical neutronical neutronological alutronism should be recognized as class 4."

E. On May 25, 2010, the Defendant: (a) the Plaintiff’s functional disorder caused by the fixed alcohol Nos. 2, 3, and 4 of the 2010, falls under the her main functional disorder of the middle light; (b) the degree of neutical damage is limited to the degree of neutical damage; (c) however, given that the neutical disorder of the neutical ebal ebal ebal ebal eculation is a person with high level of spinal ebal eculation disorder; and (d) the remainder claimed by the Plaintiff cannot be recognized, the Plaintiff’s final disability grade remains high at the same time.

arrow