logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.09.06 2017고단2353
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 2, 2017, at around 23:40, the Defendant received 112 reports from the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, stating that “A person who takes a alcohol” is “A person who takes a alcohol” and sent to the site, and on the ground that the police officer, who was a police officer of the Seoul Guro-gu Police Station C police station, was able to come home from D, who was dispatched to the site, fright the police officer was frighted to sat down himself.

C. As the “fluore”, the police officer interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the 1112 Report Report by assaulting the above D’s right blue and the right blue at one time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to Inspector D (Interference with the execution of public duties);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report dispatch to violent sites;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) the circumstance in which the defendant is found to be wrong; (b) the degree of interference with the performance of official duties; (c) the records of the crime (not less than three times prior to the punishment; and (d) the circumstances of the crime; and (e) the circumstances that conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant’s age, sex behavior, and environment, are considered.

arrow