logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.06.14 2018누39326
강제추행등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case where the part of Article 3(1) of the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed as follows. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. 1) The lawsuit of this case is difficult to be considered as an appeal litigation under Article 4 of the Administrative Litigation Act. In the case of a party lawsuit, Article 39 of the Administrative Litigation Act provides that the State, public organization and other subject of rights and duties as the defendant. In this case, "the vice chief of the police station of second instance," designated by the plaintiff as the defendant, is merely the name of the head of the government office, and cannot be deemed as the subject

Therefore, the instant lawsuit is filed against a non-qualified person.

In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow