logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.05.30 2017고단6499
특수상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On April 26, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for ten months with labor for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Intermediating, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts, at the Seoul Central District Court (hereinafter “Seoul Central District Court”) and was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on May 5, 2017.

【Criminal facts” around 08:00 on August 30, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 119, the main point of the trade name “C” located in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu, Seoul, for the following reasons: (b) the Defendant used the ice fice of plastic material, which is a dangerous object on the table of the victim D (34 tax) and used the ice fice flab, and put the victim into the right flab, etc., where the number of days of treatment is unknown to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statements of witnesses D and partial statements of witnesses E;

1. A damaged photograph;

1. Each investigation report (No. 8,9,10 No. 10)

1. Previous convictions: He/she asserts that a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, and a report on the result of confirmation of the previous conviction (the defendant and his/her defense counsel did not have an intention to injure the defendant;

However, there are the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence of the ruling, i.e., the fact that the defendant has carried ice towards the victim:

(2) In full view of the fact that the Defendant and the victim were seated in the nearest place at the time of the occurrence of the instant accident, the Defendant was aware of the possibility that the Defendant might suffer an injury, and not only was aware of the possibility that the Defendant could have suffered an injury, but also had the intention of internal deliberation to allow the result of the occurrence of the injury.

I would like to say.

Therefore, the defendant is at least.

arrow