Text
Each public prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The Defendant is a victim B (n, 46 years of age) and a person living together from 2005 to October 2014.
No one shall allow any person to reach another person repeatedly in the form of code, words, or sound that arouses fear or apprehension through an information and communications network.
In March 2015, the Defendant knew that the victim B is living together with another male, and used C mobile phone on April 3, 2015, he wanted to die, i.e., bitch bitch bit, bitch bitch bitch bit, bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch.
Malibus c. one time.
60 60 602
I. Irried.
- the same years of age.
From April 15, 2015, until April 16:12, 2015, a victim B's cell phone was transmitted 18 times in total, such as a list of crimes.
2. Each of the facts charged in the instant case is a crime falling under Articles 74(1)3 and 44-7(1)3 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc., which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 74(2) of the same Act. The victim withdrawn his/her wish to punish the Defendant on May 29, 2015, after the institution of the instant indictment. As such, each of the instant charges is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.