All of the appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. Determination of the Prosecutor’s misunderstanding of the facts and misapprehension of the legal doctrine

A. According to the evidence presented, the court below found the Defendant not guilty of all the facts charged of this case concerning violation of the Agricultural Cooperative Act and violation of the Trust Act, and erred by misapprehending the legal principles.

B. The lower court recognized the circumstances as indicated in its reasoning by comprehensively taking account of the adopted evidence, and based on this, proved that this part of the facts charged is beyond reasonable doubt.

It is difficult to see

The Court rendered a not-guilty verdict.

Examining the various circumstances cited by the lower court in a thorough and consistent manner with the record, there is no reasonable circumstance to deem that the lower court’s determination of evidence was clearly erroneous or that the argument leading to the acknowledgement of facts is significantly unfair due to the violation of logical and empirical rules.

We do not accept the prosecutor’s assertion that the lower judgment erred by mistake or misunderstanding of legal principles on the premise different from this premise.

2. The appeal by the prosecutor of conclusion is dismissed on the grounds of appeal.