(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.06.19 2015고정283

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.06.19 2015고정283

특수협박등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A thief: (a) around September 1, 2014, the Defendant arbitrarily sold and stolen the thief (S50) of the victim’s property at a vinyl farm located in the Cheongdo-gun, Cheongdo-gun, Cheongdo-gun, Cheongdo-gun, with the total amount of KRW 3.5 million and the total amount of KRW 5.5 million.

2. Around September 13, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 15:00 on September 13, 2014, at the instant vinyl farm; (b) on the ground that the victim’s her friend and her female friend who was drinking in the criend, tried to see the victim D in drinking twice on the ground that the victim’s friend and her friend were her friended by having his her friend in the criendus, and (c) the victim’s friend was friended on two occasions on the ground that her friend and her friend was friended by having his her friend who

3. The Defendant damaged the victim’s property so that, at the same time and place as that set forth in the preceding paragraph, the victim would be able to take the victim’s camping room with a view to the marier and the victim’s sprinking net while making the marier’s sound, and the marier’s sprinking net with a view to the marier’s and the sprinking net (2.60,00 won at the market price), the replacement cost of the marie (on the left side of the 90,000 won at the market price), the sum of the sprinking cost of the vehicle (on the left side of the 2.30,00 won at the market

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant (as of the second trial date);

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. A copy of a trading statement;

1. Application of photographs and receipt Acts and subordinate statutes to damaged vehicles;

1. The pertinent legal provisions on criminal facts and the choice of punishment under Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Articles 284, 283(1) (the selection of fines), 369(1), and 366 (the fact of destroying and damaging special objects, the selection of fines) of the Criminal Act, and the defense counsel’s right to the purport that larceny is not established since the search period in the judgment of the defendant and the victim are owned jointly by the defendant and the victim.

However, there are things in the joint ownership relationship with others.

참조조문

-형법 제283조 제1항

-형법 제284조

-형법 제329조

유사 판례

-창원지방법원 밀양지원 2016.05.13 2016고합4

-서울북부지방법원 2019.10.18 2019고합294

-창원지방법원 2018.12.14 2017고단3960

-울산지방법원 2016.06.30 2016고단803

-대구지방법원 2014.02.20 2013고단7007