The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) shall be excessively unreasonable.

2. It is reasonable to take into account that the defendant had no previous criminal records or heavier than that of the previous and suspended execution of execution. However, the crime of this case was committed after the defendant leased an officetel and arranged the defendant to employ a female sexual traffic and receive money from an unspecified male, and then received brokerage fees for the sexual intercourse. The crime of this case seems to require strict punishment for the crime of this case in order to stop the malicious cycle of the sexual traffic industry. Although the defendant was found to have caused the crime of this case at the end of economic difficulties, the defendant continued to engage in the act of arranging sexual traffic during the investigation even after the defendant was found to have committed the crime of this case, and in full view of various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, character, conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances before and after the crime, and thus, the defendant's allegation of unfair sentencing is unreasonable

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.