logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2014.02.25 2013고단2757
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등폭행)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant shall be the director of the Daehan in Busan Shipping Daegu C.

At around 12:01 on June 2, 2013, the Defendant received repeated questions from the victim E (the age of 49) who is a nurse due to the problem of oriental medicine in the D's medical examination room of D's medical clinic, and threatened the victim with a threat to the victim by threateningly threateningly threateningly threateningly threateningly threatening the Defendant to see, “Woo (the total length of 70cm, the knife length of 30cm) which was a dangerous object after the I't know about the reason that she would be asked as a "I will be asked at the first place of the trial," and “I am, I am, I am, and I am.” The Defendant saw the victim as the victim who escaped, and threatened the victim by threatening the victim as I am.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (on-site exit);

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that there exists no record of heavier punishment than a fine, and that his mistake is recognized);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The summary of the facts charged in the primary charge against the defendant as to the non-guilty part of Article 48 (1) 1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act is as follows: at around 12:01 on June 22, 201, the defendant committed assault against the defendant's worker and nurse's victim as stated in the D's medical examination room around 12:01 on June 22, 2013; however, there is no evidence to support that the defendant used a brus and threatened the victim with the brus and used a brus and used a brus, and in fact committed assault against the victim. Thus, this part of the facts charged in this part constitutes a case where there is no proof of a crime, and thus, the defendant must be acquitted pursuant to the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, but

arrow