Text
1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.
2. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.
3. The total costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by J.
purport.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. (1) The Plaintiff’s status as a party 1) was a religious organization established by D around 1939 with the centering around D, and as a religious organization established with the focus on D, the articles of incorporation or bylaws governing the Plaintiff’s internal and external relations, which are established by the articles of incorporation or regulations governing the Plaintiff’s internal and external relations, and there is a headquarters in Daejeon-gu E. (2) The Plaintiff’s representative is “Do governor” and the Plaintiff’s believers is respectively called “Do governor”.
3) As examined below, Defendant B is a person designated by the Plaintiff’s five senior Do governor as the next order, and Defendant C is a father of Defendant B. The Plaintiff’s Do governor’s Do governor’s Do governor’s Do governor’s Do governor’s 1) amendment in 1986, and June 2, 1996 (hereinafter “third Do governor’s Do governor”), and the third Do governor’s Do governor was amended on January 3, 2001 (hereinafter “fourth Do governor”).
Article 13 (Succession to Age) of the third Do class shall be designated at the time of the survival of the former Do class. If no designation is made and no designation is made, public announcement shall be made by a resolution of the Do class Committee.
Provided, That the Do governor's stone shall not exceed 30 days.
Article 34 (Resolution of General Meeting) 1) The main contents of the Plaintiff’s third class lecture and the fourth class lecture are as follows: 2) the approval of the project plan of the Do governor, 3) the dissolution of the Do governor, 4) the dissolution of the Do governor and the change of the Do governor 5) the disposal of property, sale, donation, security, loan, acquisition 6) approval of the budget and settlement of accounts, 7) the approval of the branch office, establishment or dissolution of the Do governor 8) the appointment of the Do governor 2) the main contents of the Do governor 2) the Plaintiff’s third class lecture and the fourth class lecture are as follows. However, in the fourth class of the Do governor, the approval of the general meeting is unnecessary. If the Do governor, who is the second class of the 4th class lecture, interferes with any of the following activities, the Do governor 12 (Disciplinary action) may damage the Do governor’s duty of disciplinary action or not fulfilled the Do governor’s duty of disciplinary action: