Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On August 17, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and two months for fraud, etc. in the Sungnam Support of Suwon Friwon, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 25, 2017.

【Criminal facts” around 17:50 on June 27, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s face at 4 Dong-dong, Seoul, Dong-dong, 6-dong, Seoul, 37, with the definition of Songpa-gu, on the ground that the victim D (49 tax) at hand said that the victim D (49 tax) at hand said that he was the Defendant’s body and she was the Defendant’s body, she was taken the victim’s face, she was satisfing, she was satfing the victim’s body, and she was satfing the victim’s face by drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Previous conviction: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, (A), reporting on criminal investigation (period of repeated crime and confirmation of concurrent crimes after Article 37 of the Criminal Act);

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which had been sentenced to three months of imprisonment for fraud at the Changwon District Court on November 4, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime in the detention center without being aware of the fact that the Defendant committed the crime in the detention center without being aware of the fact that the execution of the sentence was completed at the Changwon Prison prison on November 26, 2015, even though the period of repeated offense was completed, the Defendant committed the crime in the detention center; there are multiple criminal records for the same crime; the victim’s damage has not been recovered; Provided, That the damage is minor and the equity with the case where the judgment becomes final and conclusive at the same time, etc., shall be determined by taking into account the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant trial.