logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2019.08.21 2018나1388
약정금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not different from the allegations in the court of first instance (the plaintiff did not submit to this court a document containing specific grounds for appeal after submitting a petition of appeal), and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance may be deemed legitimate.

Accordingly, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows: “The plaintiff claims that the contents of the confirmation of settlement of this case set off or deducted the plaintiff’s claim against C and the retirement allowance claim against D Co., Ltd., but according to the evidence Nos. 1 and 3, it is reasonable to deem that the plaintiff’s claim against C is a retirement allowance claim against the defendant for the plaintiff)” is added to “The ground of the judgment of the court of first instance,” and thus, it is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding “the plaintiff’s claim against C for a set-off or deduction against the defendant’s claim against C.”

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow