beta
Text
1. All appeals filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) against the instant principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be the principal lawsuit.
Reasons
1. Determination on the main claim
A. 1) The Plaintiff is a person engaged in the manufacture and sale of plastic products with the trade name of “C,” and the Defendant is a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of plastic plastic products. 2) From February 2015, the Plaintiff was requested from the Defendant for the production of plastic suck sucks (hereinafter “the instant smil smil smils”) in the following shape:
3) On May 2, 2018, the instant milk bottle 1 sets consisting of one body (in this case, consisting of a two body "in original body" and "in original body"), six-day type "place" and six-day type "place". 4) The Plaintiff received a purchase order from the Defendant on May 2, 2018, and supplied the Defendant with the instant milk bottle 1,000 sets on May 17, 2018.
(1) The parties concerned have no dispute over the following facts: (a) the sum of the total value of (won) 1,000 1,1500 1,150,000 / Large (White) 1,150 / 1,150 1,150 1,150 / 350,000 in the original form and the sum of 1,650 350,000 /650 2,650 ,650,000 5); and (b) the Plaintiff received a purchase order from the Defendant on June 14, 2018 (the physical body is written in the purchase order, but the fact that the Plaintiff was requested to manufacture the mil bottle is written only in the purchase order, but it is not a dispute between the parties concerned:
On July 6, 2018, the Defendant supplied the instant milk bottle 5,000 sets to the Defendant. On July 6, 2018, the Plaintiff supplied 10,800 sets of window loss to the Defendant on a deposit basis with the original unit price (cost) unit price (cost) in the unit price of a name name (cost) and (f) in the original form (f) on a deposit basis (f) 5,000 1,500 7,500,000) in addition to the instant milk bottle building unit, the Plaintiff received a written order for purchase from the Defendant on June 29, 2018, and then supplied 10,800 window loss to the Defendant on a deposit basis as follows:
The fact that the value of the unit price (cost) price of goods name (per unit) is 120,200,000 type B 120,200,00 [based] No dispute exists, Gap-1, 2, 6 through 8, Eul-2, 10, and 15, each entry, video, and the purport of the whole pleadings;
B. Judgment 1.