1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 15, 1992, the Plaintiff was appointed as a military secretary in charge of the management of the reserve forces belonging to B company, and served in Changwon-si C company, etc. and retired on June 30, 2015.

나. 원고는 2016. 10. 31. 피고에, 신청 상병명을 ‘경추간 추간판 탈출증’(이하 ‘이 사건 상병’이라 한다)으로, 재해 경위를 ‘2014. 6. 초경부터 사단 정기감사에 대비하여 장시간 동안 컴퓨터 워드작업을 하다가(이하 ’1차 재해‘라 한다) 이 사건 상병 진단을 받은 후 치료를 받고 호전되어 치료를 중단한 바 있는데, 2015. 1. 13.경 사단 조직편성관에게 종합평가 결과 최하위로 평가되어 문책전보 대상자가 되었다는 연락을 받은 스트레스를 받아(이하 ’2차 재해‘라 한다) 목이 뻣뻣해지는 등의 증상이 나타난 상황에서 2015. 1. 14. 8:30경 동파된 수도관을 수리하면서 수도관을 덮은 이불을 들어내다 뒤로 넘어져(이하 ’3차 재해‘라 한다) 목이 삐끗하는 통증을 느껴 병원에 갔다가 이 사건 상병 진단을 받았다’는 취지로 기재한 공무상요양승인신청서를 제출하였다.

C. On November 30, 2016, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the non-approval of medical care for official duties (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation between the instant medical branch and the official duties.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 4, and 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. Although the Plaintiff’s assertion was caused by the Plaintiff’s king Witness’s disease, the injury of this case was caused or aggravated at a natural progress level due to the above accidents, and thus, the Defendant’s disposition of this case conducted on a different premise is unlawful even if the proximate causal relation between the injury of this case and the official duties of this case was recognized.

(c) the judgment is the official disease as stipulated in Article 35(1) of the Public Officials Pension Act; or