beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) against the appointed parties C, KRW 5,695,508, and KRW 500,000 and each of the said money.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. Fact 1) The Selection Party: (a) around 18:20 on January 18, 2015, along with the Plaintiff, who was an infant, and operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Ansan”)
2) The instant accident is one of the following: (a) an article dealing with the extensive bones of a bridge beyond the slives of the slives of the slives of the slives of the slives; (b)
2) At the time, the snow was seen as falling off, and the delivery outside the Defendant’s safety guards took place, and the floor of the Defendant’s safety guards was constructed as a man-made seat. At the entrance of the Defendant’s safety guards, there was only a small range of bits to remove the bits without diameter.
[Reasons for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, entry of Gap evidence 2-1 through 3, Gap evidence 8, the result of verification of evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings
B. The Defendant, at the time, was aware of the fact that water was slicked on the floor of the safe source operated by himself, and that there was a situation in which water was slicked by persons entering the Defendant’s safe source at the time (e.g., small amount of slicks alone to prevent water from being contaminated), and thus, the Defendant is obliged to take measures to inform customers of the fact that water was slicked, or that the floor was slicking.
Since the accident of this case is recognized to have occurred due to the defendant's failure to fulfill the above duty of care, the defendant is responsible for compensating for damages suffered by the designated person and the plaintiff.
C. Negligence offset: (a) negligence is set-off: (b) negligence is recognized, even if the plaintiff was negligent in neglecting his/her duty of care to ensure his/her own safety as he/she well as the snow and water laid at the entrance, using a set at the entrance, and thus, (c) negligence is recognized as one proof of negligence, which does not call attention to the designated parties.