1. Of the judgment of the first instance, KRW 25,51,744 against the Plaintiff and its related amount from June 13, 2016 to October 18, 2019.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition or dismissal as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The following shall be added to the 5th page of the judgment of the first instance, which is either added or written:

The defendant entered into the management contract of this case with Gap's 3, 6, Eul's 1, 7, 8, 10, 16, 19, 21 through 24 (the following circumstances acknowledged by each entry, including land numbers) as follows: (1) the plaintiff, not the defendant directly entered into a contract for the maintenance and repair of parking facilities of this case; (2) the plaintiff, operating the parking facilities of this case, paid 1870,000,000 won from the above parking facilities management personnel D's 1,870,000,000 won for each month while operating the parking facilities of this case; (3) the insured of the warranty insurance policy was originally changed to the plaintiff; (4) the management expenses imposed by the defendant and the settlement of the management expenses for the parking facilities of this case; and (5) the management expenses for the parking facilities of this case are not separately paid by the plaintiff to the parking facilities of this case; and (5) the management expenses for the parking facilities of this case are not separately determined by the plaintiff.

Therefore, the management and operation of the parking facility of this case is carried out.