logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 서부지원 2019.06.13 2018고정577
실화
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On August 23, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Busan District Court on August 31, 2018, and the judgment became final and conclusive.

【Criminal Facts】

On November 16, 2017, at around 09:08, the Defendant discarded tobacco butts near the shoulder dust (streak) in front of the office C office, the third floor of the building B in Busan, the office, the 3rd floor of the building B in Busan, and discarded tobacco butts. The Defendant caused public danger by burning the remaining fire and burning the roof board, etc. of the building which remains in the market.

It was revised ex officio according to facts obtained through the examination of evidence without the amendment process to the extent that it does not disadvantage the defendant's defense right.

In particular, since evidence of the market price of the destroyed part is not submitted, it shall be listed in the US.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of a witness I;

1. Statement to J police officers;

1. Notice on the result of fire-fighting; and

1. Previous convictions in the judgment, etc. which became final and conclusive in relation to the defendant : A criminal investigation report [Attachment of the judgment, etc. which became final and conclusive in relation to the defendant 37] (the defendant pointing out that the cause of the fire can be different from that of the defendant satt cigarette but it is clear that the defendant satis in light of the direction of the fire and the degree of the fire satt lawfully adopted and investigated by the court i.e., the situation acknowledged by the evidence that the cause of the fire can be different from that of the defendant satt, i.e., ① in light of the direction of the fire satch and the degree of the fire satt, the defendant satis in the third floor of the above building where no other person than the defendant had access to the fire satt, and ③ in light of the fact that the fire in this case occurred

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 170 (1) and 164 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. The Criminal Act dealing with concurrent crimes;

arrow