logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2018.05.17 2018고정39
대기환경보전법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant engaged in the external restoration business of motor vehicle type C with the trade name "D," and installed a seal of 69 square meters, which is an air pollutant emission facility, at the same place from October 5, 2013 to September 8, 2017, without reporting the installation of emission facilities to the Mayor/Do Governor from October 5, 2013.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Written charge and written confirmation of violation;

1. A criminal investigation report (one-time 7);

1. On-site photograph Defendant and defense counsel’s assertion, the Defendant and defense counsel asserted that the Defendant did not have a seal for each term from the above company, and that for each term, the volume of volume does not exceed five cubic meters, and that the Defendant was not subject to reporting.

Articles 23(1) and 2 subparag. 11 of the Air Quality Conservation Act, Article 11(2) of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, Article 5 and [Attachment Table 3] of the Enforcement Rule of the same Act

2. B. 25) According to the above provision, “A person who intends to install a painting facility with a volume of volume exceeding 5 cubic meters or power exceeding 2.25 km (including a powder-free facility, a powder-free facility, and a building facility)” shall file a report on the installation of air pollution emission facilities with the Mayor/Do Governor. According to the above provision, whether a report on the installation of air pollution emission facilities is required or not, and whether the Defendant actually used a painting facility is not directly related to the installation.

In full view of the above evidence, it is recognized that the defendant had been engaged in work with three paint emission cases, etc., such as a string, a string, and a string, etc., on the workplace of 69 square meters, and the defendant can verify the situation in which the paints, etc. emitted from each string machine are distributed to the bottom of the workplace. In full view of the structure, form, and operating principles of the above workplace, the above workplace using every string machine as well as every string machine is reported under the above law.

arrow