logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.07.23 2014고정1848
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant,

1. Around July 2010, at the Dong Chang-gu Seoul Jung-gu D’E, and at the Dong Chang-dong group, the fact is not that the victim F, who was a friendly victim F, was a woman in the U.S. but was a member of the Boston G in Boston. However, while he was hearing several persons, such as Boston H, he damages the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by openly pointing out the victim’s reputation.

2. Around April 201, 201, the victim’s reputation is harmed by openly pointing out facts by stating that “the victim’s reputation was damaged by the victim’s reputation, i.e., the parent-child I, who works in the Ministry of National Defense, with the father-and-child with the father-child working in the Ministry of National Defense; hereinafter the same shall apply);

3. Around October 2013, L operator’s car toward the “K” sports center located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which led to the victim F, damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out a fact-finding fact by stating that “A person is a public official of the head of the army, who is the father of the father of the father of the father, is a public official of the army, and is a public official of the head of the army, and should be buried in the society by finding out his name, and making him be held in the Internet as an bad feasia, and his children would be not a lifelong funeral.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. Determination as to the defendant and defense counsel's assertion recorded on the third trial date of witness F, I and L

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts that ① the indictment method is unlawful because the facts charged in this case are not specified; ② there was no statement made at the time and place indicated in the judgment of the defendant, and ③ there was no intention to defame performance and defamation.

2. Determination

A. Article 254(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides for the specific elements of the facts charged to determine whether the facts charged are specified.

arrow