The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal does not have the same statement as that in the facts charged.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant also asserted the same purport in the court below. The court below rejected the Defendant’s assertion on the following facts: (a) the Defendant’s distribution of the prior leaflet to the effect that “The Victim’s Countermeasures Committee, the Chairperson, was established on the part of B; (b) the date and time and place of criminal facts were disclosed; and (c) the Defendant’s “F at the time of the instant case,” in investigative agencies and courts, was omitted from the list of recipients of compensation; (b) the Defendant received a number of million won from B; and (c) the Defendant did not seem to have any circumstance that could be falsely published in F’s statement; (d) G, S (P appears to be a clerical error); and (e) Q was stated in investigative agencies that part of the Defendant’s statements were written.

B. In light of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below in light of the circumstances revealed by the court below, the above judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and there is no error of misconception of facts as alleged by the defendant.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

① At the investigative agency, S stated, “The Defendant stated that he was written by the victim with the amount of KRW 50 million on the side B.”

② Q made a statement to the investigative agency that “The Defendant left from the Corporation that the Defendant was the victim.”

Defendant.