logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.04.24 2014고단1686
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 20, 2010, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million from the Incheon District Court to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a summary order of KRW 4 million from the Incheon District Court to a fine for the same crime on October 29, 2012.

On May 25, 2014, at around 02:31, the Defendant driven CranXG car with approximately 500 meters alcohol concentration of 0.208% from the 500-meter section to the road located in the front of Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) is a person engaging in driving a Cran XG car;

On May 25, 2014, at around 02:31, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, and led to a two-lane road in front of the Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si along the two-lanes from the telephone station distance protection area to the Seocheonbuk-gu basin, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at a speed of about 50km.

At that time, the Defendant had a duty of care to change the lanes from the two lanes to the first lane while the victim D (the age of 28) driving one lane in the same direction passes through a vehicle driving, and thus, the Defendant had a duty of care to change the lanes only when there is no risk of collision in consideration of the distance between the vehicle in front of the direction of the course and the vehicle in the changed lane when the driver of the vehicle is well able to see the situation and accurately manipulate the steering gear, brakes, etc., and the vehicle is changed.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so under the influence of alcohol and did not look at the situation of the above low-priced vehicle, and was negligent in changing the vehicle due to the change of the vehicle line, and received the front part of the right-hand side of the vehicle driven by the Defendant on the left-hand side of the franchise XG.

Ultimately, the Defendant.

arrow