logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2012.09.20 2012고합166
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동강요)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint coercion) along with C (the Daegu District Court’s Branch Branch on April 5, 2012)’s indictment, and around November 2010, at the house located in D apartment B, Dong C, located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul, to the victim E (here, 43 years old) who was committing an act to satise in the gambling place at the time of gambling, and detained him by reporting that he did an act to satis in the gambling place. On October 7, 2010, the indictment was written as “Maman” but in light of the evidence records of this case, it appears that he appeared to mean the part of Maman’s self-defense. When I was unable to meet, it appears to be a witness to appear before the police and make a false threat to the victim’s statement.”

However, in fact, the facts that H appeared at the time when H was in his/her hands and did not have any fact at the time he/she was in his/her son. However, the written indictment was written on November 19, 2010 by the victim around November 18, 2010, but according to the E’s E’s written statement of statement (Evidence No. 31) concerning H’s case, according to the E’s written statement of statement (Evidence No. 31), the date on which H appeared and stated on November 19, 2010. As such, the written indictment was written on November 19, 2010.

Around October 7, 2010, the Seoul Geumcheon Police Station appeared and made a false statement to the effect that “H observed several times as Marina Mabru.”

Thus, the defendant, in collaboration with C, threatened the victim E, caused the victim to perform an act of non-performance of obligation with respect to the case related to H which is not good between C and C.

2. On February 2010, the Defendant violated the Attorney-at-Law Act: (a) at G’s house located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D apartment B, 4002, and his/her inner female, K’s agent who was investigated by the Gyeonggi Provincial Police Agency’s metropolitan investigation group to be suspected of opening gambling houses; and (b) at K’s agent who was investigated by J as a suspicion of opening gambling houses.

arrow