1. The sentence against the accused shall be nine million won;

2. The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

On June 5, 2017, the Defendant received a 112 report stating that “on the alleyway along the road would interfere with traffic,” on the alleyway B in front of the Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong

The bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a police.

A bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch frier Mahmmar, Mahhhmar, and the vehicle is set up on the road and continuously obstructed the vehicle's progress, and the above slope E resisted a hand-off to arrest the Defendant as an offender of interference with general traffic, and caused an injury, such as a part of arms and arms, which requires approximately two-day medical treatment, to the victim, who is wheeled with the right-hand part of D in the above slope E, with the face-to-face part of the above slope E as a hand-to-face.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the 112 reported duties by police officers in uniform and legitimate performance of duties concerning arrest of flagrant offenders, and at the same time injured the victim E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to E and D;

1. A written statement;

1. A report on the arrest of a flagrant offender;

1. Each investigation report and accompanying materials;

1. A report on internal investigation and accompanying materials;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the 112 Report Processing List and the victim E medical certificate;

1. In cases of obstructing the performance of official duties under the relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with respect to the instant crime is not good in light of the background, method, and degree of interference with official duties, etc.

Although the defendant had been subject to criminal punishment three times due to violent crimes, he/she also committed the crime of this case.