A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle B.

1. On April 5, 2014, the Defendant driven the said car on April 5, 2013:45, and proceeded three-lanes of the four-lanes in front of the gallonian department store located in Suwon-si transfer in Suwon-si, and turned the three-lanes of the four-lanes in front of the gallonian department store, from the galcinian department store to the galcinal balton-si.

On the other hand, since the victim C-Operation D-ro taxi was in the order of signalling, there was a duty of care to safely stop and proceed according to the traffic situation in the case of the driver of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and continued to run as it is, and received the back spread of the taxi above as Defendant’s passenger car.

The Defendant, by the foregoing occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim C, such as scopical salt fat, etc., requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim C, and at the same time, went away without taking necessary measures, such as immediately stopping the said taxi, even though it damages approximately KRW 2,39,478 to the victim E of the said taxi for about three weeks of medical treatment.

2. Around 04:00 on April 5, 2014, when the Defendant escaped as prescribed in paragraph (1), the Defendant continued one lane of the two lanes, which was located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and which was located in the second line, at the flood of Suwon-do, to the juvenile cultural center at the flood of Suwon-do.

At that time, the victim FF driver's Gsch Rexcar on the front side of the defendant vehicle, and the victim H driver's I Lata taxi on the rear side, respectively, stopped the progress of the defendant vehicle.

In such cases, there was a duty of care to safely stop driving service providers.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and got the back of the Defendant’s car, thereby getting the victim’s taxi driver in front of the taxi.