1. The Defendant’s lease agreement on July 20, 206 on the real estate listed in the separate sheet against B is time limit.

Description of Claim

The plaintiff (the former trade name before the merger) is the mortgagee of the real estate (hereinafter referred to as "the real estate in this case") listed in the attached Table B as the creditor of B.

On April 9, 2018, the Plaintiff received a voluntary decision to commence the auction from the instant real estate to this court C.

In the above auction case on June 5, 2018, the Defendant leased the instant real estate from B to July 20, 2006 to KRW 30 million, and resided in the instant real estate from July 18, 2006, and received the fixed date on October 14, 2009, and applied for a report of right and a demand for distribution as to KRW 30 million.

However, the Defendant did not lease the instant real estate from B or paid the deposit to B, and did not reside in the instant building.

Accordingly, the plaintiff is seeking to confirm that there is no obligation to return the lease deposit under the lease agreement of July 20, 2006 on the real estate of this case to the defendant B, and as long as the defendant contests the existence of the above obligation, there is a benefit of confirmation.

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Articles 208 (3) 1 and 257 (1) of the Civil Procedure Act);