logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.02.06 2014고단4454
사기등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 9, 2014, the Defendants ordered beer and beer, etc. as if they would pay the amount to the victims at the “Ging” shop operated by the Victim F in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

However, in fact, the defendants thought the above singing points to be the singing, and the provision of alcoholic beverage and the singing in singing is illegal business, so they did not intend to pay the above price because they used it and intended not to pay it.

The Defendants were provided with 5 Madjus equivalent to the market price of 60,000 won from the victim’s seat.

As a result, the Defendants were provided property by deceiving the victim.

2. On April 9, 2014, at around 22:30 on April 22, 2014, Defendant A received a report from 112 that the customer did not pay the drinking value at the same place as indicated in paragraph (1) and received a recommendation from the police officer of the Seoul Gwanak-gu Police Station Haak-gu Police Station, which was called “I” to pay the drinking value, and assaulted by both hand as follows: “I’s falsp balp balp walp walp walp walp walp walp walp walp.”

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in regard to 112 reports.

3. On April 9, 2014, the Defendant: (a) arrested A as a flagrant offender committing an obstruction of performance of official duties on the grounds of the same reasons as described in paragraph (2) in front of the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and took a bath to prevent Defendant B from carrying on the patrol vehicle, and assaulted Defendant B with the wheels of the said I’s hand, with the tear of her hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the escort of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness F, K, L, and I;

1. The description of each part of the police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. I.D.

arrow