A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

An applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

On August 10, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 19:35 on August 10, 2018, on the ground that the victim B’s horse satis around D convenience stores located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government did not come to her mar, and (b) took part in a dispute with the victim, the Defendant sustained the victim’s face at least four weeks of drinking, resulting in an injury to the victim, such as an alley satum,

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. Investigation report (Investigation of the counter party of the shootings);

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 32(1)3 and (2), and Article 25(3)3 (the scope of liability to compensate against an applicant for compensation is unclear; thus, it is not reasonable to issue an order for compensation in the criminal proceedings of this case) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Dismissal, etc. of Application for Compensation Order;

1. The serious injury in the aggravated area (six months to two years and six months) of category 1 (the scope of recommendations) of general injury;

2. In full view of the facts that the Defendant was sentenced to suspended sentence for violent crimes, including the fact that the Defendant was unable to obtain a letter from the victim, the Defendant’s character and conduct, and the circumstances after the commission of the instant case, the sentence as ordered shall be determined as per the order, and the court detention shall not be made in order to give an opportunity to recover from damage and damage.