(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.10.10 2017구단32572 (3)

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.10.10 2017구단32572 (3)

체류기간연장등불허가처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

(b) the employer’s delay in payment of wages can be understood to be in accordance with the law’s site.

Therefore, this part of the delayed payment of wages cannot be seen as an element that makes it impossible to recover the trust relationship between the plaintiff and the employer.

(C) Other circumstances eventually, the amount of delayed payment by the employer at the time the Plaintiff’s workplace ceases to work is merely KRW 192,680.

(B) In light of the above legal principles, the employer’s refusal of payment of overdue wages to the employer prior to the suspension of work, even if the agreement on the deposit of dormitory deposit was invalidated, does not appear to have existed.

The Plaintiff was paid KRW 3,780,000 by the employer prior to the instant disposition.

There are no circumstances such as that the Plaintiff was treated unfairly from a humanitarian perspective, in addition to the Plaintiff’s absence of part of wages during the period of his/her work at the workplace.

(D) The instant judgment invoked by the Plaintiff regarding the Seoul High Court Decision 2016Nu56396 Decided March 16, 2017 is inappropriate to be invoked in the instant case on the following grounds:

In fact, whether there was an agreement on the deposit of a dormitory deposit in Seoul High Court Decision 2016Nu56396, supra, and where there is no evidence to prove that there was no circumstance to deem that there was any unfair treatment other than wages in arrears, other than wages, that there was no evidence to deem that there was any reason to believe that there was no reason to believe that there was any reason to believe that there was any reason to believe that there was no reason to believe that there was any reason to believe that there was no reason to believe that there was any reason to believe that there was no reason to believe that there was an agreement on the deposit of a dormitory deposit in the Korean language and that there was no evidence that

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2018.11.22 2018고단4395

-광주지방법원 2017.08.18 2016고단4889 (1)

-광주지방법원 2018.04.19 2018고단109

-창원지방법원 2018.05.02 2017고단3878

-서울남부지방법원 2016.06.28 2016고단4