logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.05.25 2017고정583
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

The sentence against the accused shall be 2,00,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving freight B.

On March 15, 2017, the Defendant driven the upper vehicle at around 16:05, and driven the front road in front of Gwangju Northern-gu C from the Southern Industrial Complex to the same high-speed road.

No driver of any motor vehicle shall change course when it is anticipated to impede normal traffic of other motor vehicles running in the direction to which he/she intends to change his/her route.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the damage to the left-hand side of the victim D( South, 33 years old) driving on three-lanes in the same direction as the right-hand side of the vehicle driven by the defendant due to the negligence of changing the course into three-lanes.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by its occupational negligence, approximately two weeks of salt and tension to the victim F, who was on board the victim F, who was on board the victim in the 2-day police officer, for approximately two weeks of medical treatment. The Defendant suffered salt and tension to the victim F, who was on board the victim in the 32-day police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on investigation (a written statement and a medical certificate attached);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the actual survey report;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is based on the following factors: (a) the sentencing conditions in the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, the background and result of the instant crime; and (b) the circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the sentence is determined as ordered.

A favorable normal situation: The defendant has been divided into and reflected in his mistake.

There is a family member to support the defendant.

Unfavorable circumstances: The nature of crimes is not good in light of the method of crime and the degree of damage of the accused.

arrow