1. The Seoul High Court Decision 2016Na2083816 decided February 8, 2018, against the Defendants, prior to the remanding of the first instance judgment.

1. Objects to be tried on the political party after remand;

A. 1) The Plaintiff is jointly accused Co-Defendant B, C, I, J and L Co., Ltd. (hereinafter collectively referred to as “B, etc.”) in the first instance trial.

2) On the part of the Defendants, the Defendants filed a claim for restitution of unjust enrichment or for reimbursement of expenses based on office management, and the conjunctive Company F (hereinafter “F”).

(2) Each of the claims filed against B, etc. for the reimbursement of expenses due to the subrogated management expenses, the claim for restitution of unjust enrichment, and the office management, but all of which were dismissed. (2) The plaintiff appealed and filed for the appeal against B, etc. during the proceeding of the trial prior to the remanding of the case, and (2) the claim for restitution of unjust enrichment subrogated to F (the claim for restitution of unjust enrichment equivalent to the service cost or the section for common use, and the claim for restitution of unjust enrichment equivalent to the installation cost of CCTV and the section for common use, and the claim for restitution of unjust enrichment equivalent to the cost of unmanned security) and the claim for restitution of unjust enrichment equivalent to the amount of the substitute

(2) The plaintiff's claim amount stated in the plaintiff's claims against the defendants shall be limited to the plaintiff's claims against J and L Co., Ltd., and the remaining claims against J and L Co., Ltd., and the plaintiff's claims against B, C, and I shall be dismissed. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are partially accepted, and the remainder of the claims are dismissed. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are partially accepted, the remainder of the claims and the claims against the plaintiff are dismissed, and the above claims against B, etc. and the defendants are all dismissed. The plaintiff's claims against B, etc. and the defendants were all dismissed. (4) The plaintiff's appeal against the judgment before the remand was dismissed by J and the defendants, while the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the defendants' appeals against the defendants.