logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2015.08.17 2014누6822
건축허가처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows, and the reasons for this court's explanation is as follows, and the reasons for the second argument are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the fifth statement to the fifth statement to the seventh fifth statement of the judgment of the court of first instance (the second argument to the fifth statement to the fifth statement to the fifth statement of the judgment of the court of first instance (the second argument to the second argument to the second one). Thus, it is accepted as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. It is added to the end of the statement to the "relevant Acts and subordinate statutes" to the end of the statement to the 11th statement of the judgment of the court of first instance (the fifth statement to the fifth fifth statement to the fifth statement of the judgment of the court of first instance). Second, the plaintiff's determination on the second argument that the defendant's disposition of this case, which rejected the plaintiff's

Article 64 (1) of the National Land Planning Act provides that no Special Metropolitan City Mayor, Metropolitan City Mayor, Special Self-Governing City Mayor, Special Self-Governing Province Governor, Special Self-Governing Province Governor, or head of a Si/Gun shall permit the construction of buildings or the installation of structures, other than urban or Gun planning facilities, which are determined as the place where urban or Gun planning facilities are to be installed,

Article 61 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act provides for “In cases prescribed by Presidential Decree,” where an urban or Gun planning facility is determined on the ground, water surface, air, underwater, or underground by setting a specific spatial limit, and where a building or structure, which is not an urban or Gun planning facility, is installed on the site of the building or structure, which is an urban or Gun planning facility, to the extent that it does not impede the installation, use, and possibility of future expansion of the urban or Gun planning facility, such building or structure refers to “( Subparagraph 1).

Items 2 and 3 shall not be written in connection with this case.

arrow