1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 25, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for unemployment benefits with the Defendant for unemployment benefits on the ground that “the Plaintiff had worked in the Dispute Settlement BankB and retired from office on September 13, 2013,” and received 3,51,060 won of job-seeking benefits for 99 days in total from October 2, 2013 to January 8, 2014, upon recognition of the eligibility for benefits of KRW 180 days for the fixed benefit payment days and daily amount of job-seeking benefits of KRW 3,51,060 from the Defendant.

B. On March 17, 2014, the Defendant reported the Plaintiff’s illegal receipt of unemployment benefits against the Plaintiff and investigated the Plaintiff’s representative director, C, etc., the Plaintiff, who is the director of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and subsequently reported that the Plaintiff was retired to receive unemployment benefits in collusion with the business owner even if the Plaintiff continued to work in the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and subsequently, issued a payment restriction, return order, and additional collection disposition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) against the Plaintiff on March 17, 2014.

C. The Plaintiff filed a request for review with an employment insurance examiner, but the said request for review was dismissed on August 8, 2014, and again filed a request for reexamination to the Employment Insurance Review Committee, but the request for reexamination was dismissed on December 3, 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, Eul evidence Nos. 2, 3, 6 through 9, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion was made by preparing a resume at the B Office of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. using a computer, etc., and was not actually employed in the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., but was otherwise determined by the decision of this case, it was unlawful as it erred by mistake of facts.

In addition, considering the reality that the unemployment rate reaches 20 to 30% and that it is difficult for a female plaintiff to find further employment, the instant disposition is inappropriate.

(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.

C. In light of the following circumstances, which are acknowledged by the facts of the above recognition and the purport of the evidence Nos. 1, 4, and 5 and the entire argument, the Plaintiff shall continue to exist in the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd.