logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.10.15 2013구합57785
손실보상금
Text

1. The Defendant: 23,386,400 won to Plaintiff A; 5,49,600 won to Plaintiff B; 1,749,000 won to Plaintiff C; and 5,000 won to Plaintiff E.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Approval and Public Notice of Projects - Promotion Project (H) for Underdeveloped Areas (hereinafter “instant Project”) - I publicly notified by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on December 27, 2011 - Project implementer: the Administrator of the Korea Forest Service.

B. The adjudication of expropriation and its objection 1) The Central Land Expropriation Committee made on January 18, 2013 - Land subject to expropriation: 22 lots, including the 1,108 square meters in J-gun, Chungcheongnamcheon-gun, Gyeongcheon-gun, the Plaintiff owned, 6 lots, such as the 1,842 square meters in K, Kwon-gun, the 2,245 square meters in a permanent residence owned by the Plaintiff C, and 4 lots, including 2,245 square meters in a permanent residence owned by the Plaintiff C, 30,546 square meters in a forest owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each land of this case”).

2) Each of the obstacles owned by the plaintiffs and each of the obstacles owned by the plaintiffs (including each goodwill on plaintiffs C N and EO, hereinafter collectively referred to as "each obstacles of this case").

- The date of commencement of expropriation: (a) the Central Land Tribunal shall increase the amount of compensation for a part of the land and obstacles on July 18, 2013 of the ruling of objection made by the Central Land Tribunal on February 18, 2013.

1) Each of the instant lands is used as an irregular type of land, flat, and complete slope land located in Qriman Pricheon-gun, Gyeongcheon-gun, Gyeongcheon-gun, and Qricheon-gun, farmland, forest land, and forest land, electric power resource housing, and pentol restaurant. The surrounding land has good traffic conditions. 2) The adjudication on expropriation and objection, and the adjudication on appraisal by the appraiser R (hereinafter “court appraiser”) entrusted with the appraisal by the court, each of the amount of compensation recognized according to the results of the appraisal by the court is as follows.

However, as the lawsuit of this case, the plaintiffs total sum of the compensation amount of the kind of the plaintiff's property in the court's appraisal of this case.

1. A land: 802,978,300 won 804,806,100 won 822,527,598,140 won 893,263,260 won 1,690,576,440 won 1,692,404,240 won 1,715,790,640 won ;

2. B’s dismissal of 568,727,150 won 574,247,300 won 71,670,550 won 71,650,00 won 640,397,700 won 645,897,300 won 645,70 won 640 won 645,70 won 647,300 won

3. C Land 125,495,50 won dismissed 125,944,500 won 60,816,330 won

arrow