Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The crime history room (2018, 1038), the defendant and the victim B (55 years old) are double-presidential systems, and the co-owners of over-presidential land, the place where the case occurred, and there are many disputes over land.

The Defendant, from around 15:00 on July 8, 2018 to 21:00 on the same day, extracted steel gates from which the market price set up by the victim cannot be known by using sckes in order to enter into the land of Goyang-gu C-U.S. C-U.S. on the same day.

계속해서 피고인은 과수원 토지 내로 들어가 토지에 심겨 있던 피해자 소유의 은행나무 52그루, 자두나무 3그루, 호두나무 2그루, 복숭아나무 1그루, 감나무 2그루, 깻잎 500주를 포크레인을 이용하여 캐어내고 한쪽에 몰아 놓은 후 그 위에 흙만 덮어 놓음으로써 나무들에 상처가 가고, 제대로 성장하지 못해 죽게 만들어 재산상 효용을 해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. Application of on-site photographs, damage photographs submitted by victims, and statutes;

1. Article 36 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Article 334(1) of the Act on Provisional Payment Order (Article 334(1) of the Act) states that the act of the defendant, like this case, constitutes a justifiable act as part of lawful management action against the complainant who seeks to occupy and use the land exclusively with a majority of the share of the land in this case. However, even if the defendant is a majority right holder of the land in this case, the act as stated in the decision without undergoing any other means or procedure is not reasonable, and it seems that the means or method is not reasonable, and that the defendant and the defense counsel do not meet the requirements such as urgency and supplement. Thus, the defendant